“the ford pinto case is mentioned in most business ethics texts as an example of cost-benefit analysis, yet in those formats any appreciation of the complexity surrounding the issues of such decisions is overly simplified. The ford pinto case 22 the ford pinto th ere was a time wh en the “ made in japan” label brought a predictable smirk of superiority to the face of most americans the quality of most japanese products usually was as low as their price in fact, few. Ford neglected to add reinforcements to protect the easily ruptured fuel tank, endangering drivers while earning the pinto a reputation for catching fire that persists today the automaker's.
The ford pinto was an american subcompact car produced from 1971 to 1980 it was developed as ford's entry into the small car marketplace pressures from foreign competition and the looming rise in gas prices incentivized ford’s upper management to cut the pinto’s delivery time in half. The pinto fire controversy - ford was accused in lawsuits of failing to make the pinto safer when rear-end crashes caused fires learn more about the pinto fire controversy 1971-1980 ford pinto accident investigations in many of the cases revealed that victims had few, if any, trauma injuries as a result of the impacts, but had burned. The cases involving the explosion of ford pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.
In the pinto case, the ford motor corporate heads and engineers were responsible for producing a vehicle known to cause deaths and disfigurements as was the young driver of the van crashing into the pinto, causing the deaths of the three young girls. Ford knows the pinto is a firetrap, yet it has paid out millions to settle damage suits out of court, and it is prepared to spend millions more lobbying against safety standards. The ford pinto case introduction in this term paper, i will talk about the ford pinto case, and how the data was denied from public in alignment to save business from gigantic losses and at the identical time hold company's status intact.
The case further shows that the pinto was no more fire-prone than other cars of the time, that its fatality rates were lower than comparably sized imported automobiles, and that the supposed “smoking gun” document which showed ford’s callousness in designing the pinto was a document based on national highway traffic safety administration. The ford pinto is a subcompact car that was manufactured and marketed by ford motor company in north america, sold from the 1971 to the 1980 model years the public understanding of the cost-benefit analysis has contributed to the mythology of the ford pinto case. The ford pinto case is mentioned in most business ethics texts as an example of cost-benefit analysis, yet in those formats any appreciation of the complexity surrounding the issues of such decisions is overly simplified. Act utilitarianism applied to the ford pinto release posted on march 12, 2013 by ckienzle (a paper i wrote for my business ethics class, not particularly a particularly creative or exciting assignment but i wanted to show some of my more formal writing. The ford pinto case is today considered a classic example of corporate wrong-doing and is a mainstay of courses in engineering ethics, business ethics, philosophy, and the sociology of white-collar crime.
In relations to ford pinto, the case study shows that is was about an accident which took place involving a ford pinto and a chevrolet van which hit the ford pinto from behind the pinto was being driven by an 18 years old judy ann ulrich accompanies by her sister lynn marie who was 16 at the time and cousin called donna ulrich was also 18. Ford claimed that the pinto’s fuel-tank design was the same as other subcompacts, and that the company had done everything possible to comply with the recall once it had been enacted. Ethics ford pinto case study discussion and executive summary this paper explores “the ford pinto case” managing of business ethics numerous factors suggest within this research that ford motor company was negligent and violated its code of ethics. Ford pinto fires case study and executive summary john bonner, scotti greenleaf, rose scarbrough mgt216 university of phoenix october 18, 2010 sarah nelson ford pinto fires case study and executive summary introduction during the late 1960’s the ford motor company was one of the leading auto manufactures in the united states.
This feature is not available right now please try again later. The ford pinto case: a study in applied ethics, business, and technology (suny series, case studies in applied ethics, technology, and society) oct 25, 1994 by douglas birsch and john fielder paperback $1998 $ 19 98 to rent prime $3395 $ 33 95 to buy prime free shipping on eligible orders in stock. Grimshaw v ford motor company (119 calapp3d 757, 174 calrptr 348) was a personal injury tort case decided in orange county california in february 1978 and affirmed by a california appellate court in may 1981 the lawsuit involved the safety of the design of the ford pinto automobile, manufactured by the ford motor companythe jury awarded plaintiffs $1278 million in damages, the largest. Case analysis ford pinto 1 29/07/13 mvbe amritaschool of business, coimbatore group 1 agroup 1 a managerial ethics &managerial ethics & business valuesbusiness values ii mba 2012-14ii mba 2012-14.
In 1971 ford motor company decided they wanted to create a compact car that could compete with the other japanese manufactured cars it rushed from its inception to its actual production. Custom the ford pinto case essay in 1971, american giant car maker ford motor company introduced a small, light and cheap car, named pinto its design was aimed at reducing the time of manufacturing and to reduce material cost and gas consumption. Case 22 the ford pinto discussion questions 1 although the pinto passed the nhtsa test, ford officials knew that the pinto was prone to catch fire when struck from the rear, even in low-speed collisions, thus it was unsafe to drive the car without any technical improvements implemented.
Grimshaw v ford motor company, 1981 the pinto, a subcompact car made by ford motor company, became infamous in the 1970s for bursting into flames if its gas tank was ruptured in a collision. The ford pinto was a subcompact manufactured by the ford motor company for the north american market, first introduced on september 11, 1970, and built through the 1980 model year. The pinto was to cost less than $2,000 and weigh less that 2,000 pounds during crash tests which preceded the introduction of the pinto to the public, it became apparent that the vehicle had a dangerous design flaw.